|
Title: Ignorant Question (RE: Peterson) Post by: murfvol on August 10, 2018, 11:41:34 EDT Did we have the option to take Peterson or Lawless, and let the latter walk because he seemed less likely to make it?
Title: Re: Ignorant Question (RE: Peterson) Post by: Tnphil on August 11, 2018, 09:31:25 EDT The word I've heard is they wanted Lawless to blueshirt and pay his own way until Jan. Just what I've heard and have no idea if true. Also I think Peterson is a clearinghouse issue right now. Fulmers needs to earn his keep....he's already got one big strike giving Warlick a extension.
Title: Re: Ignorant Question (RE: Peterson) Post by: HerbTarlekVol on August 11, 2018, 09:53:25 EDT Heard pretty much the same on both.
This coaching staff was never really high on Lawless. And every day we go without news on Peterson it's less likely he's going to be cleared. From what I have been told, the issue may be that some of the core classes he took didn't match up with the clearinghouse requirements. Title: Re: Ignorant Question (RE: Peterson) Post by: murfvol on August 12, 2018, 06:13:34 EDT Thank you gentlemen. Seems like the class issue should have been picked up administratively much earlier.
|