|
Title: This performance by AU is less than optimal.* Post by: Black Diamond Vol on March 19, 2018, 02:50:04 EDT :frown:
Title: Re: This performance by AU is less than optimal.* Post by: VinnieVOL on March 19, 2018, 02:52:10 EDT Has a 4 seed ever lost by 40+? :crazy:
Title: Re: This performance by AU is less than optimal.* Post by: Black Diamond Vol on March 19, 2018, 03:06:45 EDT Has a 4 seed ever lost by 40+? :crazy: I don't know for sure, but without looking it up I think UNLV might've done it once or twice back in the day. I remember them blowing out some really good Duke and Loyola-Marymount teams. Title: Re: This performance by AU is less than optimal.* Post by: Tnphil on March 19, 2018, 03:19:27 EDT I think it's safe to say with this SEC cluster so far the SEC won't be getting 8 in the tourney next year.
Title: Re: This performance by AU is less than optimal.* Post by: Black Diamond Vol on March 19, 2018, 03:40:40 EDT I think it's safe to say with this SEC cluster so far the SEC won't be getting 8 in the tourney next year. Maybe, but aTm looked capable of getting to the F4 today, and UK will get there easily (at least until they have to vacate). Title: Re: This performance by AU is less than optimal.* Post by: BanditVol on March 19, 2018, 06:10:23 EDT I think it's safe to say with this SEC cluster so far the SEC won't be getting 8 in the tourney next year. We advanced two, which is what should have happened. 75% of all teams eliminated, 75% of all SEC teams eliminated. Or if you want to look at it a slightly different way, technically only 4 seeds and above should advance (which of course, never happens). The SEC had one 3 seed and one 4 seed. Now, those two teams did not advance, but two SEC teams did advance. So the SEC met expectations. Would have liked to have seen better, but it's not a disaster by any means. |