How many college football players get ejected the first weekend.....

[droner]

......due to the new targeting rule? Division I-A only (or the FBS as it's stupidly called).

I'll go with 10.

Any Vols? I'll go with 0 but I think it could happen by accident.

[LouisVOL]

Watched the whole debate on ESPN yesterday with various media  types and also officials around the country, many of whom said that Clowney's hit against Michigan would have been illegal and therefore ejection.  If the rule is called to that ridiculous level, it will hurt the game, disenchant fans, frustrate coaches, and result in player injuries from unnatural attempts to avoid player injuries.  In other words, there will be a bunch of P.O.'d folks.  I just hope officials call it judiciously--what are the odds of that?

[droner]

Watched the whole debate on ESPN yesterday with various media  types and also officials around the country, many of whom said that Clowney's hit against Michigan would have been illegal and therefore ejection.  If the rule is called to that ridiculous level, it will hurt the game, disenchant fans, frustrate coaches, and result in player injuries from unnatural attempts to avoid player injuries.  In other words, there will be a bunch of P.O.'d folks.  I just hope officials call it judiciously--what are the odds of that?

I think that most new rules are called conservatively at first, with warnings given. But I don't think that's the way it goes with this rule. If the officials make a mistaken call, I think they err on the side of being strict.

[Black Diamond Vol]

All I know is if just one team loses a game due to this rule, it'll be us.  And it will probably happen against UF, if history is any indication.

[Jedi Master]

What we are seeing is the wuss-ification of football.  Started in the NFL with QBs, based on protecting offenses and maximizing points scored.  Now it is at the NFL and college level, and is being promoted as player safety, but it is really risk mitigation based on potential litigation.  

One one side, many believe the Clowney hit should be illegal as it "looked dangerous."  On the other side, many believe it was a legal hit that impacted the chest first, then Clowney's helmet slid up to knock the helmet off the Michigan RB.  Some refs this year will view it as the former, other refs will view it as the latter.  Which is why I hate this rule, because it will be a judgment call.  Teams always get screwed sooner or later when it is left up to the ref's judgment.  

[Clockwork Orange]

If the Clowney hit is the standard for ejection in some conferences, you will see an ejection every game. Seriously. I don't think it will actually be enforced that strictly, and it makes me wonder if these officials are posturing to get the NCAA to make a lesser recommendation for enforcement of that rule.

[VinnieVOL]

All I know is if just one team loses a game due to this rule, it'll be us.  And it will probably happen against UF, if history is any indication.

Exactly my first thought.

[Tnphil]

Hate the rule....but IMO the NCAA is scared sheetless that like the NFL, players are going to start filing lawsuits in the near future for head and neck injuries.

[murfvol]

This isn't about the players, it's about legal protection. The part that galls me is the ejection aspect. That's stupid and way too subjective. Losing 15 yards to a questionable call is bad, but losing a player is horrific.

[droner]

The count now stands at 2.