And yet UT tied it up again a little over 2 minues remaining.
It may have been a bad call. It did not decide the game.
Another way of looking at is, our shorthanded team still managed to remain competitive without one of their best players. So then, logic dictates that we clearly would have won if Maymon had remained in the game. See how that works?
The fact is, the game was a total coinflip to that point, then Maymon fouled out, and you guys never looked back from there. Did the call decide the game? Would we have won without it? We'll never know. And just because
you say it didn't decide the game doesn't necessarily make that true.