|
Title: Case by Case CFP criteria Post by: BanditVol on November 29, 2022, 11:01:21 EST SOS - Vols 7 Bammer 8
Heads up Vols 52 bammer 49 Common opponents LSU Vols 40-13, bammer 31-32; Vandy Vols 56-0 bammer 55-3. vs current Top 25 Vols beat LSU and bammer; bammer beat Texas Conference champsionships...obviously 0 for both Its interesting that everything is so close, even the Vandy score, with Vols having a slight advantage across the board (the exception is Conference Championships which is a wash). However the LSU result simply leaps out. We decisively defeated the West champion at their place, bammer lost there. No doubt we should be no. 6 tonight. If we are not, the CFP got some 'splainin' to do! Title: Re: Case by Case CFP criteria Post by: BanditVol on November 30, 2022, 01:14:06 EST bammer 6
I get the subjective opinion based on our recent, bad loss to Junior But...the criterion are a joke. Committee did NOT follow them in our case. Title: Re: Case by Case CFP criteria Post by: Volengineer on November 30, 2022, 02:50:57 EST College football rankings and the heisman have both always been a sham. It's not worth the aggravation for me anymore. From Johnny Majors and Peyton Manning getting screwed over to this crap tonight isn't worth the extra blood pressure medication. I've enjoyed this season more than most I can remember. The Turd knows we put that L on them. I almost hope USC loses just to hear the howling that will start afterwards.
Title: Re: Case by Case CFP criteria Post by: BanditVol on November 30, 2022, 06:06:15 EST I almost hope USC loses just to hear the howling that will start afterwards. Yes that would be fun :naughty: |