|
Title: For Pete's sake......... Post by: droner on October 05, 2013, 10:54:33 EDT ....the option doesn't work if the QB won't run the ball once in a while. If he doesn't, there's no freaking option. There's just a handoff to the running back. :mad:
Title: All part of the long con. Post by: Jean Voljean on October 05, 2013, 11:10:57 EDT By the 4th quarter UGA is going to get complacent. Then Worley drops the hammer.
You know you're having a tough season when 3-17 at the half isn't all that disappointing. Title: Re: For Pete's sake......... Post by: PirateVOL on October 05, 2013, 11:19:32 EDT It would also help if there was a threat of a passing game ...
Title: Re: For Pete's sake......... Post by: HerbTarlekVol on October 05, 2013, 11:20:21 EDT ....the option doesn't work if the QB won't run the ball once in a while. If he doesn't, there's no freaking option. There's just a handoff to the running back. :mad: Preach on, brother. Preach on. And open another bottle of Malbec. :beer: Title: Re: For Pete's sake......... Post by: droner on October 05, 2013, 11:23:26 EDT Preach on, brother. Preach on. And open another bottle of Malbec. :beer: I'm getting ready to go on a nice Sauvignon Blanc. And......Danielson said the coaches had encouraged Worley to run it some but he doesn't do it. Either he doesn't read it well or he doesn't want to run. I don't know squat but I think it's obvious Worley isn't a read-option QB. Title: Re: For Pete's sake......... Post by: tngamecock on October 05, 2013, 11:24:44 EDT ....the option doesn't work if the QB won't run the ball once in a while. If he doesn't, there's no freaking option. There's just a handoff to the running back. :mad: I was typing a thread on this same topic...soon as I hit enter, I saw your post. I was beginning to believe it was just me noticing this. I agree with you 10 fold. |