VTTW Board Index
May 11, 2024, 11:55:54 EDT *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Game and TV Information - Next football game: Tennessee at Missouri, November 11, 2023, 3:30 p.m. ET, CBS. Go Big Orange!

Message Board Links - Wayne and Hobbes' Auburn Board, Mudlizard's Vitual Swamp
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Rough start to the season for the SEC top dogs. I'm not sure the Vols will be  (Read 3276 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
volsboy
All-SEC
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4407



View Profile
« on: November 13, 2013, 05:42:30 EST »

a top dog. Why can't the Vols score? Not the way to be successful in todays game. Never since Martin took over have they had a productive offense. If they don't improve they will just have a decent season, not a really good one. Looks like the SEC could struggle again this year. On a positive note, they were playing some real good teams. They will all get better as the season wears on.
Logged

volsboyinsodak
Tnphil
All-American
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7044


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2013, 05:54:12 EST »

KY was playing a real good team.

IMO UT was playing a average team that we should have beat 10 plus. Mich State or KY would have beaten them by 20.
Logged
Creek Walker
Guest
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2013, 05:56:08 EST »

I thought UK was overrated, so their close game against Michigan State was actually impressive to me. I hate to say it, but I think UK is going to be better than I expected them to be. To have that many true freshmen on the floor and lose by only a handful against the nation's No. 2 team...not too shabby.
Logged
SmokeyJoe
Guest
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2013, 12:09:04 EST »

KY was playing a real good team.

IMO UT was playing a average team that we should have beat 10 plus. Mich State or KY would have beaten them by 20.

// this //
Logged
BanditVol
Heisman
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 23697


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2013, 12:38:27 EST »

KY was playing a real good team.

IMO UT was playing a average team that we should have beat 10 plus. Mich State or KY would have beaten them by 20.

I dunno.  Xavier is 174-26 in their last 200 games at home.  Quite an advantage.

Yes we still could have and should have beaten them, and the team did not play well, but Xavier is a good team.  ESPN power rating of 27 with us at 20...that Christon is a great player too.
Logged

"The speed of our movements is amazing, even to me, and must be a constant source of surprise to the Germans.”  G. Patton
Tnphil
All-American
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7044


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2013, 01:35:37 EST »

I dunno.  Xavier is 174-26 in their last 200 games at home.  Quite an advantage.

Yes we still could have and should have beaten them, and the team did not play well, but Xavier is a good team.  ESPN power rating of 27 with us at 20...that Christon is a great player too.

IMO that Xavier team last night was not the same Xavier team I've seen over the last many years. They played as bad as us for the most part.

We better step up our game and coaching or we'll be 1 and done in the NIT again. Stokes hasn't improved much at all since he's been in Knoxville. Maymon looked lost as a July Easter egg. It was like he didn't know what to do or where to be in the offense.

Not impressed at all. It's early but CCM teams haven't showed me much.
Logged
ChattanoogaVol
All-SEC
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1649


Time is best spent with family and friends.


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2013, 02:55:04 EST »

Am unimpressed with Martin period dot!  His teams do not look well coached at all, and really seem to have trouble in the half court set scoring, and how can't we crash the boards with 2 big beast men in the game.....looks like they got beat up inside by Xavier, and I know that our 2 are much better than what they have.

 
Logged

Go Big Orange.
BanditVol
Heisman
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 23697


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2013, 04:00:44 EST »

IMO that Xavier team last night was not the same Xavier team I've seen over the last many years. They played as bad as us for the most part.


They did look rough, but it was the opener for both squads.  I'm still pretty impressed with their home court advantage.  Of course everyone plays a lot of creampuffs at home, but that's still around an .850 win percentage at home.
Logged

"The speed of our movements is amazing, even to me, and must be a constant source of surprise to the Germans.”  G. Patton
Tnphil
All-American
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7044


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2013, 04:45:35 EST »

They did look rough, but it was the opener for both squads.  I'm still pretty impressed with their home court advantage.  Of course everyone plays a lot of creampuffs at home, but that's still around an .850 win percentage at home.

Actually after the game they said they were 2-0. Must have already played a game?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!