Title: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: BanditVol on November 12, 2012, 07:47:27 EST I had to install some software that required babysitting for ~20 minutes, so I went ahead and looked up these stats here:
http://web1.ncaa.org/stats/StatsSrv/rankings?doWhat=archive&sportCode=MFB This is a list of the worst scoring D's in the SEC for the period 1999-2012, which is all the NCAA has archived. 2012 UT 37.00 2011 OM 32.08 2010 OM 35.17 2009 AU 27.62 2008 Ark 31.17 (Tamu...33.54) 2007 UK 29.6 2006 UK 28.4 2005 UK 34.1 2004 UK 31.0 2003 MSU 39.3 2002 Van 30.7 2001 Van 36.5 2000 UK 34.8 1999 UK 29.4 So...MSU was the worst in the last 13 years, and to catch them we would have to allow about 48 ppg to UK and Vandy...not likely, but I am not even going to predict we won't, lol! Not that it matters but....the "winner" on this list is UK followed by Vandy followed by Ole Miss. Not very surprising that those teams are down there, and no way should UT be on any list with their records of "incomperitude". I feel slightly better that Arkansas and AU made the list, but not really. Just FYI...BDV asked about this below. Title: Re: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: BanditVol on November 12, 2012, 07:54:10 EST Oh yeah, I added Tamu on there even though they weren't in the conference yet...just to show that, hopefully, things can turn around. :thumbup:
Title: Re: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: Black Diamond Vol on November 12, 2012, 08:27:30 EST Interesting. Are those numbers for all games, or league games only? I'd be willing to bet that we're the worst in league games.
Title: Re: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: BanditVol on November 12, 2012, 09:05:47 EST Interesting. Are those numbers for all games, or league games only? I'd be willing to bet that we're the worst in league games. All games. The league games aren't tracked. I thought of what you say, but odds are that the OOC games are much better across the board, ourselves included. Or that they cancel out. Title: Re: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: Creek Walker on November 12, 2012, 09:15:05 EST Mississippi State gave up 41.3 ppg in SEC games in 2003. Tennessee is currently giving up 43.7 ppg in SEC games this season.
Title: Re: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: Clockwork Orange on November 12, 2012, 09:29:18 EST Interesting. Are those numbers for all games, or league games only? I'd be willing to bet that we're the worst in league games. For league games, if our current average holds it is the worst SEC defense since 1979 Vanderbilt, which gave up 45.3 in SEC play. This UT defense is currently giving up 43.7. Next on the list would be 1995 South Carolina at 40.0, which is So if UT gives up 58+ points in its last two games (likely, IMO) it will tie or beat that South Carolina team and will have given up an average of 40+ points, becoming only the Still this paints a pretty ugly picture of how pathetic this defense is. All data is from Ken Massey, btw. Edit: Creek Walker is right . . . 2003 MSU also gave up 40+, so we'd be the 4th team. Good catch, Creek. Title: Re: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: MIAUTIGER on November 12, 2012, 09:49:21 EST For league games, if our current average holds it is the worst SEC defense since 1979 Vanderbilt, which gave up 45.3 in SEC play. This UT defense is currently giving up 43.7. Next on the list would be 1995 South Carolina at 40.0, which is So if UT gives up 58+ points in its last two games (likely, IMO) it will tie or beat that South Carolina team and will have given up an average of 40+ points, becoming only the Still this paints a pretty ugly picture of how pathetic this defense is. All data is from Ken Massey, btw. Edit: Creek Walker is right . . . 2003 MSU also gave up 40+, so we'd be the 4th team. Good catch, Creek. Well, we won the MNC one year after posting the worse Scoring Defense in 2009. So, there is some hope (but only if you pay for a phenom QB, amiright Vinnie?). Title: Re: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: VoLynteer on November 12, 2012, 09:52:27 EST Well, we won the MNC one year after posting the worse Scoring Defense in 2009. So, there is some hope (but only if you pay for a phenom QB, amiright Vinnie?). We don't have money for that right now, we have to give Jon Gruden a bazillion dollars and my one good kidney. Title: Re: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: BanditVol on November 12, 2012, 11:20:38 EST Still this paints a pretty ugly picture of how pathetic this defense is. All data is from Ken Massey, btw. Thanks for posting that. Could you post a link? I'd like to bookmark it. I googled Ken Massey but got a whole lot of other stuff. Title: Re: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: BanditVol on November 12, 2012, 11:23:14 EST Interesting stuff, but given that our next worst year was 27 ppg (in all games, not just SEC)..... :hurl: :hurl: :hurl:
What a proud tradition Tennessee has, and how it's getting mangled now. But we can hope this is temporary, like 62-64, or the early Johnny years. Title: Re: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: VinnieVOL on November 13, 2012, 04:32:06 EST Well, we won the MNC one year after posting the worse Scoring Defense in 2009. So, there is some hope (but only if you pay for a phenom QB, amiright Vinnie?). :nod: :nod: Title: Re: Year by year SEC scoring D's Post by: Clockwork Orange on November 19, 2012, 02:16:45 EST So if UT gives up 58+ points in its last two games (likely, IMO) it will tie or beat that South Carolina team and will have given up an average of 40+ points, becoming only the Thought it would be Also, for Bandit: http://masseyratings.com/team.php?t=7801&s=181623 (http://masseyratings.com/team.php?t=7801&s=181623). Within any team's season you can click on their conference twice to get to a league summary screen (like this one (http://masseyratings.com/team.php?t=14028&s=181623)), which is how I quickly scanned through points allowed in conference year-by-year. |