Title: Changing Vols' culture Post by: VinnieVOL on December 12, 2012, 05:07:11 EST http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blogpost?blogname=ncfnation&id=73866 (http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blogpost?blogname=ncfnation&id=73866) Title: Re: Changing Vols' culture Post by: UTnbama on December 12, 2012, 05:33:42 EST http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blogpost?blogname=ncfnation&id=73866 (http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blogpost?blogname=ncfnation&id=73866) Please, let's just have an equitable playing field (pun intended) with all the bammers and everyone else in the SEC. Tell the vampires in the Admin, etc., to stop sucking the blood out of the AD and to go pound sand! Title: Re: Changing Vols' culture Post by: Creek Walker on December 12, 2012, 06:00:28 EST You read things like that and then you wonder, "Why did anyone ever think Gruden was actually going to come to Tennessee?"
Title: Re: Changing Vols' culture Post by: BanditVol on December 12, 2012, 07:46:21 EST It's still kind of vague as to what the real problem is.
1. One of the biggest reasons that Tennessee athletic director Dave Hart pushed his chips behind Butch Jones is he believed that Jones had the chops to serve as an advocate in the Hart’s attempt to change the culture on campus. The university administration has used the athletic department as an ATM, saddling it with financial responsibilities that the Vols’ SEC competitors don’t have. Hart wanted his new coach to be able -- and willing -- to explain how that financial burden translates onto the field using the AD "as an ATM". Well that has already been addressed, at least for the next three years. The only other things I have heard are that the academic side completely controls the tutoring center and that sometimes students have had trouble being eligible. For the tutoring center, I am not sure what the big deal would be. We had a scandal over that ~ 12 years ago, and if we are being a bit more careful with how the athletes are tutored, what is the big deal? They will either put the work into class or not. As for the eligibility, maybe it's a factor but I have only heard of it affecting one or maybe two players, and that's completely second hand. This is probably the hardest to pin down of all the "disadvantages" that incur at UT from the academic side. I guess I would say that if the NCAA and SEC clear them, that should be good enough for UT and leave it at that. But I haven't really heard that this is a big problem. It seems to be mostly financial, which has been (at least temporarily) addressed. Title: Re: Changing Vols' culture Post by: 73Volgrad on December 13, 2012, 03:09:50 EST Until either Hart or Cheek come out an say what this great problem is, IMO it is an Urban Myth. What are these barriers? Unless someone can define them and demonstrate this is a problem, there is no problem. If you are complaining because some stud is to dumb to pass high school and get in, that is just too bad. If you are complaining because UT had dropped degree programs, you only have state government to blame because the actual dollar value to academics has fallen each year so UT is having to judge programs on the basis of best value to the student rather than "Let's have a hokey degree to keep athletes eligible."
Unless Hart can come forward with a list of problems and recommended solutions, he and every one else should shut up. UT is not there to support the football program. They are supposed to be student-athletes so go be a student. |