|
Title: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: BanditVol on November 27, 2018, 01:54:30 EST As I state below IMO the standard for an assistant can be different than for an HC (just not at OSU! lol). I'll grant that Petrino might be a bit sleazier than Freeze, but not by much IMO.
Having said that, a better reason to not want him might be the Louisville performance this year. Still, if Freeze goes elsewhere, is Petrino even an option? I have a hunch Fulmer will steer Pruitt away from anyone controversial anyway, so it may not matter. Just curious what the thoughts are on Petrino now. Title: Re: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: volsboy on November 27, 2018, 04:26:23 EST What makes you think UT is above hiring someone sleazy? That Kiffin staff with Orgeron was pretty shady. Don't you think?
Title: Re: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: Volznut on November 27, 2018, 05:10:06 EST as an OC I would be good with it, but he would not stay long.
Title: Re: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: BanditVol on November 27, 2018, 10:29:45 EST What makes you think UT is above hiring someone sleazy? That Kiffin staff with Orgeron was pretty shady. Don't you think? Yes. The idea is we learn from past mistakes, right? Title: Re: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: volsboy on November 29, 2018, 12:12:11 EST Klingsbury....he knows how to get the ball in the end zone. Something we struggle at now.
Title: Re: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: PirateVOL on November 29, 2018, 12:23:22 EST Klingsbury....he knows how to get the ball in the end zone. Something we struggle at now. ... never mind - like talking to airTitle: Re: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: BanditVol on November 29, 2018, 12:33:10 EST ... never mind - like talking to air If Pruitt wanted to go RPO, I'd be all for it. But he doesn't, so.... :dunno: Title: Re: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: murfvol on November 29, 2018, 02:16:50 EST Petrino has lost his fastball. Plus, he nay not be not a fun guy. I say this as someone who was for him coming here.
Title: Re: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: BanditVol on November 29, 2018, 04:36:48 EST Petrino has lost his fastball. Plus, he nay not be not a fun guy. I say this as someone who was for him coming here. Freeze it is then! :naughty: Title: Re: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: murfvol on November 29, 2018, 05:07:32 EST I'd be more than fine with Freeze.
Title: Re: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: volsboy on November 29, 2018, 07:53:45 EST Why are football coaches the only profession where you can suck bad at your current job, get fired and be hired right away to a seemingly better gig. Most of these guys just failed at their jobs and we have fans fighting over getting them to their school. Crazy. BTW..Cowherd thinks Klingsbury will be OC at SoCal.
Title: Re: If Freeze,then why not Petrino? Post by: BanditVol on November 30, 2018, 07:46:07 EST Why are football coaches the only profession where you can suck bad at your current job, get fired and be hired right away to a seemingly better gig. Most of these guys just failed at their jobs and we have fans fighting over getting them to their school. Crazy. BTW..Cowherd thinks Klingsbury will be OC at SoCal. Freeze wasn't fired because he suxed at his job. He was fired for recruiting violations and also for banging ho's that he would call on his university phone. I know you don't even pretend to keep up with football, but Freeze beat Saban two years running and got Ole Miss to it's first no.1 ranking since 1960. If you call that failing at your job, then :dunno: |