|
Title: Why wasn’t 1.4 seconds put back on the clock? Post by: japanvol on February 23, 2019, 08:50:50 EST What did I miss? The refs stopped play to review everything, signaled “1.4” to the clock operator, and the announcers said the clock would be reset to 1.4 seconds. Not sure if it would have made a difference, but after all that and it wasn’t done, and nobody said anything about it. Strange.
Title: Re: Why wasn’t 1.4 seconds put back on the clock? Post by: PirateVOL on February 23, 2019, 08:55:25 EST What did I miss? The refs stopped play to review everything, signaled “1.4” to the clock operator, and the announcers said the clock would be reset to 1.4 seconds. Not sure if it would have made a difference, but after all that and it wasn’t done, and nobody said anything about it. Strange. To set the clock to 1.4, not add 1.4Title: Re: Why wasn’t 1.4 seconds put back on the clock? Post by: volsboy on February 23, 2019, 08:57:00 EST Hard to get those type of calls on the road. Should have happened though.
Title: Re: Why wasn’t 1.4 seconds put back on the clock? Post by: japanvol on February 23, 2019, 09:03:34 EST Right, the clock was supposed to be rest to 1.4 seconds. But it never was, at least what was shown on tv. It was like the scoreboard operator just ignored the instructions from the refs.
|