|
Title: NIL Math Post by: murfvol on December 29, 2024, 07:44:42 EST I have an NIL math question. Conjecture is welcome.
If we spent $15 million on NIL, what cumulative percentage went to the following groups? Poor Players Heard Campbell Iffy or Developing Players Nico Brazell Mike Matthews Braylon Staley I'm trying to figure out how much goes to productive guys as opposed to guys who could be productive in the future, or old guys who aren't producing. Title: Re: NIL Math Post by: BanditVol on December 30, 2024, 07:18:45 EST Pretty much unknowable, NIL is not subject to public scrutiny
Title: Re: NIL Math Post by: murfvol on December 30, 2024, 06:11:18 EST Indeed, and numbers which are bandied about come from those with motives.
However, perhaps it's possible to get directionally correct figures. If Nico is 2/15, Heard is 1/15, Campbell is .5/15, Brazell is .5/15, Matthews is .5/15, and Staley is .25/15, that's basically 1/3 of total outlay. Title: Re: NIL Math Post by: BanditVol on December 30, 2024, 09:33:58 EST Indeed, and numbers which are bandied about come from those with motives. However, perhaps it's possible to get directionally correct figures. If Nico is 2/15, Heard is 1/15, Campbell is .5/15, Brazell is .5/15, Matthews is .5/15, and Staley is .25/15, that's basically 1/3 of total outlay. Hm, I guess if numbers are being thrown about, you can do the math. Wondering if there are any other numbers. |