|
Title: Where was the review of that so called int??? Post by: crockettman on September 18, 2011, 01:26:53 EDT looked like it hit the ground to me
Title: Re: Where was the review of that so called int??? Post by: RockinGrannyVol on September 18, 2011, 01:27:53 EDT looked like it hit the ground to me I thought it was caught Title: Re: Where was the review of that so called int??? Post by: BigOrange Maniac on September 18, 2011, 01:29:02 EDT I thought it was caught Yeah, it was a pick. Title: Re: Where was the review of that so called int??? Post by: crockettman on September 18, 2011, 01:29:28 EDT looked like the nose of the ball hit the ground as he was juggling it..oh well doesnt matter..the more things change the more they stay the same
Title: Re: Where was the review of that so called int??? Post by: japanvol on September 18, 2011, 01:30:17 EDT I've got super slow-mo on my tv and it looked like it hi the ground to me.
Could Dooley not challenge it? Is there no automatic review? Title: Re: Where was the review of that so called int??? Post by: crockettman on September 18, 2011, 01:33:00 EDT I've got super slow-mo on my tv and it looked like it hi the ground to me. My whole point is that any play that was questionable for UT they were quick to review it and stop the game but in that play they just hurried up and let Fla snap the ball without giving UT the benefit of the doubtCould Dooley not challenge it? Is there no automatic review? Title: Re: Where was the review of that so called int??? Post by: VinnieVOL on September 18, 2011, 01:51:48 EDT My whole point is that any play that was questionable for UT they were quick to review it and stop the game but in that play they just hurried up and let Fla snap the ball without giving UT the benefit of the doubt [/quote I think it was a pick, but I agree that should've at least been looked at. I've seen plays that were a lot less obvious reviewed by the booth. |