VTTW Board Index

Sports => VTTW Message Board => Topic started by: Clockwork Orange on April 21, 2014, 01:23:38 EDT



Title: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: Clockwork Orange on April 21, 2014, 01:23:38 EDT
Then yes, we are going cheap . . . but his track record, while short, is impressive. Here are the KenPom numbers for LaTech the three years before White and the three years with White:

2009: #161 (#189 O, #146 D)
2010: #118 (#142 O, #108 D)
2011: #245 (#321 O, #125 D)

2012: #182 (#173 O, #204 D)
2013: #90 (#199 O, #35 D)
2014: #34 (#78 O, #26 D)

The defense made a huge leap forward in year two, and got better in year three when the offense made its own huge leap forward. He inherited a total disaster-- his predecessor won 20 conference games in 4 years; White followed that up by winning 35 in 3 years.

In those three years he also drastically changed their style, going from a mid-to-slow tempo game for his predecessor's teams and his first year to a top 25 tempo game the next two years.

It has the potential to turn into far more watchable basketball in fairly short order.


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: Creek Walker on April 21, 2014, 01:54:21 EDT
I have a bad habit of spending hours reading/watching everything I can about everyone who might potentially be considered for UT's coaching vacancies. I hadn't put much thought into White until I started reading up on him. After researching him, he shot ahead of everyone not named Gregg Marshall on my preference list.

Disclaimer: I thought Dooley was a good hire, too. But my excitement about Dooley was his attention to detail, organizational skills and apparent football knowledge...not anything he had actually accomplished. Mike White, OTOH, has a better resume than some SEC big-shots had when they came into the league. Look no further than Bruce Pearl and Billy Donovan for a couple of them. (Obviously in terms of postseason success Pearl was ahead of White, but in terms of winning percentage and proven recruiting prowess, White would win the nod.)


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: Volznut on April 21, 2014, 02:52:01 EDT
He's a gamble, but if it were to believed that money is tight, he will likely be the guy. I'll give him a chance.



Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: Volznut on April 21, 2014, 04:33:31 EDT
reports swirling that he has turned it down. Buyout an issue



Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: SmokeyJoe on April 21, 2014, 05:39:02 EDT
reports swirling that he has turned it down. Buyout an issue

Well that's embarrassing. My God!


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: SmokeyJoe on April 21, 2014, 05:40:15 EDT
If I was king for a day, and I won't be, not another dime on facilities for a decade!


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: VinnieVOL on April 21, 2014, 11:04:07 EDT
I'm not embarrassed.  He's likely biding his time for that Ole Miss job.

Donnie Tyndall, step on up.


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: HerbTarlekVol on April 21, 2014, 01:22:37 EDT
Well that's embarrassing. My God!

Not really.  I'm glad Hart isn't bowing to the pressure to pay the buyout.  Coaches need to be held to their buyouts, and they need to be responsible for them, not the school hiring them.  UT has had enough of buyouts over the past decade.  Don't need to be paying one that isn't even ours. 


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: Volznut on April 21, 2014, 01:43:35 EDT
Well that's embarrassing. My God!

Not at all, Hart has to protect the University



Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: Clockwork Orange on April 21, 2014, 02:21:30 EDT
Not really.  I'm glad Hart isn't bowing to the pressure to pay the buyout.  Coaches need to be held to their buyouts, and they need to be responsible for them, not the school hiring them.  UT has had enough of buyouts over the past decade.  Don't need to be paying one that isn't even ours.  

Agree 100%, even if it costs us White. Hart is probably offering a bit more in salary to put in substantially less for our part of the buyout and more for his part . . . which only makes sense if you're the university. You want to be compensating coaches that work for you, not ones you've had to fire for poor performance.

And if White jumps for Ole Miss when they fire Andy Kennedy UT needs to be protected as well. It's hard to be embarrassed or upset with Hart over this IMO.


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: Creek Walker on April 21, 2014, 02:28:30 EDT
Agree 100%, even if it costs us White. Hart is probably offering a bit more in salary to put in substantially less for our part of the buyout and more for his part . . . which only makes sense if you're the university. You want to be compensating coaches that work for you, not ones you've had to fire for poor performance.

And if White jumps for Ole Miss when they fire Andy Kennedy UT needs to be protected as well. It's hard to be embarrassed or upset with Hart over this IMO.

Once again, the stupidity of the fan base shines through. Obviously if White has rejected UT (which will be the perception, even if both sides simply couldn't come to terms), the national perception is going to be that "even the La Tech coach wouldn't take the Tennessee job." But our own fans should be smarter than that. Instead, we have a bunch of yahoos this morning bitching because Hart won't give the guy whatever he wants.

Not getting White would be disappointing, but Hart has to stand his ground.

There's absolutely nothing about Donnie Tyndall that excites me, but hopefully I'm wrong.


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: Clockwork Orange on April 21, 2014, 02:32:24 EDT
There's absolutely nothing about Donnie Tyndall that excites me, but hopefully I'm wrong.

I think you're justified. Doing the same kind of comparison I did above, Tyndall has barely improved USM. They were in the 70s (KenPom) under the prior coach and made the NCAAT twice (sorry, once), and they've been in the 50s and 60s under Tyndall and haven't made an NCAAT. That record is actually pretty similar to Cuonzo's.



Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: CONSIGLIEREG8R on April 21, 2014, 04:46:12 EDT
Any thoughts about Kermit Davis from MTSU.  Guy can coach but having a hard time recruiting at MTSU. I think he did just sign top player in bama however


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: HerbTarlekVol on April 21, 2014, 04:47:50 EDT
Any thoughts about Kermit Davis from MTSU.  Guy can coach but having a hard time recruiting at MTSU. I think he did just sign top player in bama however

He was a candidate when Martin was hired.  Has a history of some personal issues that never were answered then. 

Good coach, however.  Probably where he should be. 


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: BanditVol on April 21, 2014, 08:31:13 EDT
Not really.  I'm glad Hart isn't bowing to the pressure to pay the buyout.  Coaches need to be held to their buyouts, and they need to be responsible for them, not the school hiring them.  UT has had enough of buyouts over the past decade.  Don't need to be paying one that isn't even ours. 

Agree 100%.

Cheap hiring is one thing, being stupid another.


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: murfvol on April 21, 2014, 09:31:15 EDT
You want to be compensating coaches that work for you, not ones you've had to fire for poor performance.

Yep. I'm thrilled Hart is standing firm. If this is where we are, go the safe route with Byrd. He's got another five years.


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: BanditVol on April 22, 2014, 04:31:36 EDT
I think you're justified. Doing the same kind of comparison I did above, Tyndall has barely improved USM. They were in the 70s (KenPom) under the prior coach and made the NCAAT twice (sorry, once), and they've been in the 50s and 60s under Tyndall and haven't made an NCAAT. That record is actually pretty similar to Cuonzo's.



   :doh: :doh: :doh:


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: Clockwork Orange on April 22, 2014, 04:35:03 EDT
   :doh: :doh: :doh:

Only thing that makes it better is that his work at Morehead St was actually more impressive. They were awful when he took over.


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: BanditVol on April 22, 2014, 04:44:26 EDT
Only thing that makes it better is that his work at Morehead St was actually more impressive. They were awful when he took over.

Well that's good.

I guess 56th in the country's not awful at least.   In the KenPom rankings, they are surrounded by tourney teams above and below, so in theory they could have gone I guess.

I also like that they were 29-7...granted against a pretty lousy schedule...per KenPom 111th in the country.

They got drilled by Louisville before Christmas and beat Mizzou in the NIT.  Nothing much else about them stands out.

Does not look to be a home run hire and I think we will obviously struggle the first year.  If he can recruit there might be hope down the road though.


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: BanditVol on April 22, 2014, 05:05:50 EDT
Only thing that makes it better is that his work at Morehead St was actually more impressive. They were awful when he took over.

Yes, he had a nice run in the NCAA tourney at Moorhead State, and made it to the tourney twice in his 6 years there.  Knocked off Louisville in the 2011 tourney. 

And FWIW, won more games in his second year than his first at USM, and won...again FWIW...the regular season conference last year.

We could have done worse.   I think he might do well after the first year or two.  Recruiting will be critical.


Title: Re: If Mike White is going to be the guy
Post by: BanditVol on April 22, 2014, 05:10:49 EDT
Oh and one last thing...I have definitely seen worse hires!  At least he has a winning record, right?   :naughty:

{Cough cough}...dooley...{cough cough}

And he is a COLLEGE coach with a winning record, that Al Davis has not said is a liar.   :naughty: