VTTW Board Index

Sports => VTTW Message Board => Topic started by: PirateVOL on October 26, 2014, 03:11:39 EDT



Title: Down three scores
Post by: PirateVOL on October 26, 2014, 03:11:39 EDT
A fizzleing field goal :bird:


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: VinnieVOL on October 26, 2014, 03:13:30 EDT
A fizzleing field goal :bird:

Agreed. Chickenshizzle call.  It'd be different if this was a close game.   :banghead:


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: crockettman on October 26, 2014, 03:14:48 EDT
Stupid gimmick play with A.J Johnson only needing a yard there..WTF??? Field goals won't do any good in this game..CBJ pussed out there..What the hell?? SMDH... :confused: :confused:


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: PirateVOL on October 26, 2014, 03:16:05 EDT
Oh, we are STILL down three scores!


Title: I'm just a naive fan
Post by: Jean Voljean on October 26, 2014, 03:19:53 EDT
But that was a call intended to not lose by as much.

This game was not over.  The call to go for the field goal conceded that it was.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: crockettman on October 26, 2014, 03:26:34 EDT
3rd and 1,the obvious call should have been Dobbs under center,qb sneak,IF they get it the clock stops to move the chains and they have 2 or 3 shots at the end zone..instead they put Johnson 5 yrd back in the shot gun and don't get it and puss out for a fg..Not impressed with that kind of coaching  :banghead:


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: Tnphil on October 26, 2014, 07:55:15 EDT
Not going for it was Fulmer coaching 101.

The AJ call was just plain bad. You have a mobile QB in there for a reason. Give him a run throw option. If you want to Wildcat it....then use your 5 star RB...Hurd!!!


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: PirateVOL on October 26, 2014, 02:03:36 EDT
Not going for it was Fulmer coaching 101.

The AJ call was just plain bad. You have a mobile QB in there for a reason. Give him a run throw option. If you want to Wildcat it....then use your 5 star RB...Hurd!!!
the Beast play was poor execution.  I do not have any issue with it at all.
We went from doing everything to win to playing not to lose too bad (IMO) in one play.
BTW, I had no issue with the 2nd FG.  We had to score three times and the FG brought us to withing two TDs.  We had momentum on offense and if the defense makes a stop we have a shot, all we could ask for.  The defense didn't, or at least till our 1.


Title: Re: I'm just a naive fan
Post by: HerbTarlekVol on October 26, 2014, 04:06:10 EDT
But that was a call intended to not lose by as much.

This game was not over.  The call to go for the field goal conceded that it was.

Yep.  When you hire MAC/CUSA level coaches, you get MAC/CUSA level coaching decisions. 

One or 51 - doesn't matter.  It's still a loss.  There are no such things as moral victories or "not as bad a loss" in the SEC. 


Title: Re: I'm just a naive fan
Post by: Creek Walker on October 26, 2014, 04:13:52 EDT
Yep.  When you hire MAC/CUSA level coaches, you get MAC/CUSA level coaching decisions. 

One or 51 - doesn't matter.  It's still a loss.  There are no such things as moral victories or "not as bad a loss" in the SEC. 

Well, that settles it then. Butch was clearly playing for a moral victory.

I didn't like the call either. Hated it. I thought it was cowardly. But I'm not going to pretend to know his mind from my recliner 60 miles away.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: HerbTarlekVol on October 26, 2014, 04:20:51 EDT
OK, so explain to me why when you have the mobile QB that you haven't had, you have third and 1 and send in somebody who hasn't touched the ball offensively all year, don't get it, then go for the field goal when you are down three scores to a team you are a heavy underdog against.

Let's get real here, Creek. That was an awful decision.  Rationally and reasonably, how can it be justified?  You aren't going to get back in the game with field goals there. 



Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: SmokeyJoe on October 26, 2014, 05:02:13 EDT
I was shocked they didn't go for it! Oh well.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: Creek Walker on October 26, 2014, 05:07:40 EDT
OK, so explain to me why when you have the mobile QB that you haven't had, you have third and 1 and send in somebody who hasn't touched the ball offensively all year, don't get it, then go for the field goal when you are down three scores to a team you are a heavy underdog against.

Let's get real here, Creek. That was an awful decision.  Rationally and reasonably, how can it be justified?  You aren't going to get back in the game with field goals there. 



I'm not trying to defend the play call. As I said in my OP, I hated the call. I thought it was a cowardly call. But does that mean that Butch Jones was just trying to make the loss look respectable? Maybe, or maybe not. None of us know his intent. Believe it or not, some SEC coaches (even good ones) clinch up and make bad decisions under pressure occasionally.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: LouisVOL on October 26, 2014, 07:24:15 EDT
Well, I guess I am the lone vote for coming away with points there.  I thought the worst possible thing that could happen to the football team is to have a complete momentum killer by coming away blank.  I thought the AJ decision was stupid, but I thought the FG was the right way to go.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: RON on October 26, 2014, 09:04:31 EDT
I say we fire Butch Jones now. I think UT should hire all these Internet coaches and watch the National Titles roll in.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: Tnphil on October 26, 2014, 09:40:30 EDT
That sounds like something a Vol Chatter would say.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: HerbTarlekVol on October 26, 2014, 10:48:17 EDT
That sounds like something a Vol Chatter would say.

Or a big ole wolly orange sheep, which of course, would be your basic Vol Chatter.   :rolleyes:



Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: RON on October 26, 2014, 11:51:17 EDT
If being a Butch Jones supporter makes me a sheep then I guess I am a sheep. Butch Jones inherited a huge mess. He needs time to turn it around.  With the recruiting class in 2014 helping the Vols out this year and the 2015 lass looking strong I think the program is on the right track.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: VinnieVOL on October 27, 2014, 01:30:35 EDT
If being a Butch Jones supporter makes me a sheep then I guess I am a sheep. Butch Jones inherited a huge mess. He needs time to turn it around.  With the recruiting class in 2014 helping the Vols out this year and the 2015 lass looking strong I think the program is on the right track.

Pretty sure most of us agree with that.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: midtnvol on October 27, 2014, 02:02:07 EDT
Everybody take a couple of deep breaths and do a little math. We most likely had to have a field goal and two more possessions also. We needed seventeen points to get to overtime. Two touchdowns W/ x-tra points total fourteen. Add a three point field goal and then 14+3=anyone? anyone? that's right 17, good for you you got it right on the second try. It really didnt matter which possession provided the field goal. Keep working hard and I'm sure everyone will be able to figure out this coaching stuff.     :thumbup:


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: Creek Walker on October 27, 2014, 03:08:10 EDT
Everybody take a couple of deep breaths and do a little math. We most likely had to have a field goal and two more possessions also. We needed seventeen points to get to overtime. Two touchdowns W/ x-tra points total fourteen. Add a three point field goal and then 14+3=anyone? anyone? that's right 17, good for you you got it right on the second try. It really didnt matter which possession provided the field goal. Keep working hard and I'm sure everyone will be able to figure out this coaching stuff.     :thumbup:

Actually at that point the game was 27-7. A TD could've made it a 2-possession game, and a FG kept it at a 3-possession game. Just sayin'.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: PirateVOL on October 27, 2014, 03:16:11 EDT
Actually at that point the game was 27-7. A TD could've made it a 2-possession game, and a FG kept it at a 3-possession game. Just sayin'.
Which was pretty much my point at the time ...


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: RON on October 27, 2014, 03:23:37 EDT
I guarantee you if UT goes for it on 4th down and gets stuffed fans would be complaining about that. Right now in my opinion Butch still has a free pass. He walked into a huge mess created by Mike Hamilton'Lane Kiffin and Derek Dooley. Dooley was idiotic for signing no offensive linemen in the 2012 class. The best players in the state was leaving like crazy. If Dooley would have stayed another year Jalen Hurd'Todd Kelly JR and Josh Malone would be playing somewhere else.  Now if in 2 to 3 years UT is still a 5-6 team then maybe UT should go another route.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: midtnvol on October 27, 2014, 03:58:28 EDT
Actually at that point the game was 27-7. A TD could've made it a 2-possession game, and a FG kept it at a 3-possession game. Just sayin'.
OK then it was still a good call. The situation was with around 35 seconds to go in the half we had the ball with fourth and about 2-3 yds to get a first down. We are in field goal range and we let the clock run down to 3 secs then we kick the field goal. If we run a play quickly and don't make it then they get he ball with nearly half a minute to go some 80 yards with two time outs. Now before anyone says how unlikely they could do that remember how long their first possession lasted. There is considerable difference between being theee TDs down and two tds and a field goal. I defended his decision when it happened and I still do.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: Creek Walker on October 27, 2014, 04:22:27 EDT
OK then it was still a good call. The situation was with around 35 seconds to go in the half we had the ball with fourth and about 2-3 yds to get a first down. We are in field goal range and we let the clock run down to 3 secs then we kick the field goal. If we run a play quickly and don't make it then they get he ball with nearly half a minute to go some 80 yards with two time outs. Now before anyone says how unlikely they could do that remember how long their first possession lasted. There is considerable difference between being theee TDs down and two tds and a field goal. I defended his decision when it happened and I still do.

Well, not to be cantankerous, but it was actually 4th and just under a yard. And they would've had to go 90 yards. No way Alabama would even attempt anything other than a safe run between the tackles had they gotten the ball in that situation.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: SmokeyJoe on October 27, 2014, 04:46:09 EDT
Yep.  When you hire MAC/CUSA level coaches, you get MAC/CUSA level coaching decisions. 

One or 51 - doesn't matter.  It's still a loss.  There are no such things as moral victories or "not as bad a loss" in the SEC.

Nick Satan started as a HC at Toledo. Just stop.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: HerbTarlekVol on October 27, 2014, 04:59:18 EDT
Nick Satan started as a HC at Toledo. Just stop.

Stop?  Stop what?  Voicing my opinion? 


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: midtnvol on October 27, 2014, 05:11:53 EDT
Stop?  Stop what?  Voicing my opinion? 

I started out as a Jr. High basketball coach now look at me.....OK maybe that's not a good example but you get my drift.  :smile:


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: SmokeyJoe on October 27, 2014, 05:45:08 EDT
Stop?  Stop what?  Voicing my opinion?

Well I just debunked your opinion, but carry on.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: Tnphil on October 27, 2014, 06:37:44 EDT
I'd say Saban's experience prior to his first HC job exceeds Butch's experience.

Kent State
Syracuse
West Vir
Ohio State
Navy
Michigan State
Houston Oilers
Toledo-Head coach


Butch

Wilkes
Ferris State
Central Michigan
West Vir.
Central Mich- Head coach.

 


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: BanditVol on October 27, 2014, 06:45:09 EDT
OK then it was still a good call. The situation was with around 35 seconds to go in the half we had the ball with fourth and about 2-3 yds to get a first down. We are in field goal range and we let the clock run down to 3 secs then we kick the field goal. If we run a play quickly and don't make it then they get he ball with nearly half a minute to go some 80 yards with two time outs. Now before anyone says how unlikely they could do that remember how long their first possession lasted. There is considerable difference between being theee TDs down and two tds and a field goal. I defended his decision when it happened and I still do.

I kind of wondered about the call.  Heck, I had a friend who was really upset we didn't go for it at the 50 in the second quarter on 4th and 1 against Ole Miss, and I texted him during the game "okay this time we should go for it".

At the same time, it wasn't an awful call. We had a whole half left, and in fact we did close the gap to 27-17, which, by my math is two scores.  Heck, we held them to just 7 points in the entire second half in fact.  In retrospect it wasn't a terrible call at all.

Now why we didn't double cover Cooper in the first quarter...that one still mystifies me.  :confused:



Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: HerbTarlekVol on October 27, 2014, 04:25:52 EDT
I started out as a Jr. High basketball coach now look at me.....OK maybe that's not a good example but you get my drift.  :smile:

So, the fact that Saban coached in the MAC means that Butch Jones is the next Nick Saban?  That's debunking my opinion? 

In your own mind, maybe.  We are still seeing MAC/CUSA level decisions being made by this coaching staff.

When Butch wins National Championships at two different SEC schools come and "debunk" me then. 

And by the way, Butch is no young pup in terms of coaching.  He is 46. He took over the UT program at 45, which is older than were Dickey, Battle, Majors, Fulmer, Kiffin, or Dooley when they were hired at UT.  Being "young" isn't an excuse for Butch. 


Title: Down three scores
Post by: SmokeyJoe on October 27, 2014, 05:23:58 EDT
Nobody is saying Saban isn't "great" he didn't start as a rock star though. He has earned his reputation. Still everybody starts somewhere. I don't understand why UT doesn't swing for the fences in coaching hires either. It is a more prosperous state than Alabama, and logically should have a stronger, booster base. Surprising really.


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: BGHarper on October 27, 2014, 07:21:15 EDT
Nobody is saying Saban isn't "great" he didn't start as a rock star though. He has earned his reputation. Still everybody starts somewhere. I don't understand why UT doesn't swing for the fences in coaching hires either. It is a more prosperous state than Alabama, and logically should have a stronger, booster base. Surprising really.

Well, they did try to hit that home-run hire, but things didn't work out. I'm not convinced that had UT rounded the bases and touched home plate with the "big" hire that they would be in better shape than the present situation. I think Jones has done well due to his recruiting efforts which were priority no. 1. If you meant pushing for a much bigger hire than Dooley, then I completely agree. I thought that hire was a knee-jerk reaction to replace Kiffin with the antithesis being the good-ole southern boy who would know and respect the value of being at UT. Wrong reason to hire anybody.

As far as your state-by-state economic comparison and potential impact of a program's success, I doubt there is such a correlation since the less prosperous state of Alabama actually produces, not one, but two state schools that outperform UT with both schools holding all-time winning records against the Vols. The state of Alabama actually out produces, in a college football winning sense, far more economically successful states than Tennessee such as California, Texas and Florida. That competition between Alabama and Auburn yields a 365 day and a 24/7 effort to outperform the other. If they can outperform the other, then they can often exceed most any team.

BG





Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: BanditVol on October 27, 2014, 09:02:09 EDT


As far as your state-by-state economic comparison and potential impact of a program's success, I doubt there is such a correlation since the less prosperous state of Alabama actually produces not one but two state schools that outperform UT with both schools holding all-time winning records against the Vols. The state of Alabama actually out produces, in a college football winnining sense, far more economically successful states than Tennessee such as California, Texas and Florida. That competition between Alabama and Auburn yields a 365 day and a 24/7 effort to outperform the other. If they can outperform them, then they can exceed most any team.


And...sorry BG, but...

if only bammer had something else to feel good about, then maybe middle aged wimmen's wouldn't kick college boyz in the head, crazy ole nuts wouldn't poison trees, and ... peeps wouldn't get killed for saying the Heat is more important than bammer.

Truth hurts sometimes bro... :naughty:


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: BGHarper on October 27, 2014, 09:18:34 EDT
And...sorry BG, but...

if only bammer had something else to feel good about, then maybe middle aged wimmen's wouldn't kick college boyz in the head, crazy ole nuts wouldn't poison trees, and ... peeps wouldn't get killed for saying the Heat is more important than bammer.

Truth hurts sometimes bro... :naughty:


What about my post do you disagree with?



BG


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: Jedi Master on October 27, 2014, 09:36:37 EDT
UT fans should understand that CBJ is still a young coach who is growing in his HC role.  Not every decision he makes is going to be perfect.  By the time he restocks the roster with competitive SEC talent, he will have gained valuable experience in decisions to be made on-field (e.g., this field goal vs TD), in program development (e.g., when to play Dobbs), etc.  Much of his coaching growth will be from first-hand experience, trial and error. He may grow into the next Nick Saban, but UT fans shouldn't realistically expect that he is already at that level.  Be patient with him. 



Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: BGHarper on October 27, 2014, 09:45:19 EDT
UT fans should understand that CBJ is still a young coach who is growing in his HC role.  Not every decision he makes is going to be perfect.  By the time he restocks the roster with competitive SEC talent, he will have gained valuable experience in decisions to be made on-field (e.g., this field goal vs TD), in program development (e.g., when to play Dobbs), etc.  Much of his coaching growth will be from first-hand experience, trial and error. He may grow into the next Nick Saban, but UT fans shouldn't realistically expect that he is already at that level.  Be patient with him.  




Yep, and I'm beginning to think I've been more impressed by Jones than some Vols. Yes, UT should have beat the Gators, but that's just one game. The difference between last year's UT team and this year's team is one of toughness. Big difference between the two.

Edited to add, I thought your QB played very well, especially since he was getting next to nothing in terms of practice reps this fall as they are usually reserved for mostly the top two QB's. I don't usually judge the performance of a very inexperienced QB too harshly, as the difference between what a QB looks like as a true freshman vs. what they look like as an experienced senior is often so vastly different. I have no idea if he'll be the answer at QB, but in him the coaches at least have some tools to work with.


BG

 
 


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: droner on October 27, 2014, 09:57:32 EDT


Yep, and I'm beginning to think I've been more impressed by Jones than some Vols. Yes, UT should have beat the Gators, but that's just one game. The difference between last year's UT team and this year's team is one of toughness. Big difference between the two.

BG

It's interesting. When I talk to fans of other SEC schools here, every one of them says that they are impressed with Butch and that they think he's going to get it done at UT.


Title: I agree with Jedi! Think back to last year when Butch took over....what were
Post by: VOLMAN on October 27, 2014, 10:01:58 EDT
most wanting to see? Get competitive in recruiting again and coach the players up....we're getting players and there was huge improvement IMO from last year to this. Just how depleted our roster was when Butch took over due to Dooley's complete incompetence simply CANNOT be overly emphasized....you just don't snap back after 18 months from the kind of set back Dooley dealt us and expect to compete with the top tier of the SEC. Butch has the ship turning and we'll get there everyone just has to be realistic about the time and effort it will take.  :patriot:


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: BGHarper on October 27, 2014, 11:06:42 EDT
It's interesting. When I talk to fans of other SEC schools here, every one of them says that they are impressed with Butch and that they think he's going to get it done at UT.

Apparently so. Just read where a national writer for 247 Sports said Butch Jones was listed with other potential candidates by "sources" as someone Michigan may be interested in. Just another example of the grass being greener on the other side.

BG


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: BanditVol on October 28, 2014, 12:00:12 EDT


What about my post do you disagree with?



BG

That you should have such an inordinate amount of pride in football...it don't mean squat at the end of the day.

But if I wanted to nitpick something specific, UT has more SEC titles, a better SEC win percentage, more wins, and a better overall win percentage than Auburn. It's true Auburn holds a small advantage in the head to head, but we don't give up anything to them and I think in terms of overall SEC success, UT is still no. 2 behind bammer.  Granted, 3 n 4 aren't that far behind, but FWIW, we are the second most successful program in the SEC behind yours.



Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: BGHarper on October 28, 2014, 12:09:54 EDT
That you should have such an inordinate amount of pride in football...it don't mean squat at the end of the day.

But if I wanted to nitpick something specific, UT has more SEC titles, a better SEC win percentage, more wins, and a better overall win percentage than Auburn. It's true Auburn holds a small advantage in the head to head, but we don't give up anything to them and I think in terms of overall SEC success, UT is still no. 2 behind bammer.  Granted, 3 n 4 aren't that far behind, but FWIW, we are the second most successful program in the SEC behind yours.



OK... :laugh:

 I have no "pride" in Auburn's performance, and I know they have none in Bama's. That was a response to the supposition that the wealth of a state benefits a college football team, while contrasting the states of Tennessee and Alabama. I continued on with his example as my own state seems to disprove that theory, and that's what I pointed out. While it may help, it's not essential. That's about as unemotional, matter-of-fact and to the point as I could get. Contrary to what you may believe, I wasn't waiving Crimson and White and Blue and Orange shakers while posting it.

I didn't speak negatively of UT, all I did was mentioned the overall record between those three teams since it was central to my response. Other than your Auburn specifics, which you admittedly characterized as nitpicking, what exactly do you disagree with?





BG


Title: Re: Down three scores
Post by: BanditVol on October 28, 2014, 06:26:04 EDT


I didn't speak negatively of UT, all I did was mentioned the overall record between those three teams since it was central to my response. Other than your Auburn specifics, which you admittedly characterized as nitpicking, what exactly do you disagree with?


Nothing.  Just pointing out that your state is way too obsessed with football. 


Title: Re: I agree with Jedi! Think back to last year when Butch took over....what were
Post by: RON on October 28, 2014, 11:42:40 EDT
most wanting to see? Get competitive in recruiting again and coach the players up....we're getting players and there was huge improvement IMO from last year to this. Just how depleted our roster was when Butch took over due to Dooley's complete incompetence simply CANNOT be overly emphasized....you just don't snap back after 18 months from the kind of set back Dooley dealt us and expect to compete with the top tier of the SEC. Butch has the ship turning and we'll get there everyone just has to be realistic about the time and effort it will take.  :patriot:

Best post in the thread.


Title: Re: I agree with Jedi! Think back to last year when Butch took over....what were
Post by: BanditVol on October 29, 2014, 06:12:06 EDT
Best post in the thread.

Ditto