|
Title: An mou for Leach? Post by: tshadow on December 01, 2017, 09:30:54 EST Does that put UT in the bag for two fiduciary liabilities to coaches that never spent a day as a UT coach?
Title: Re: An mou for Leach? Post by: PirateVOL on December 01, 2017, 09:33:55 EST Does that put UT in the bag for two fiduciary liabilities to coaches that never spent a day as a UT coach? No, probably the final nailTitle: Re: An mou for Leach? Post by: FLVOL on December 01, 2017, 09:35:29 EST [q uote author=PirateVOL link=topic=36906.msg180373#msg180373 date=1512160435]
No, probably the final nail [/quote] And something that can easily be thrown back on CurrIe since he was acting on his own accord Title: Re: An mou for Leach? Post by: tshadow on December 01, 2017, 09:35:57 EST So it wasn't signed. I gotcha.
Title: Re: An mou for Leach? Post by: ReVOLver on December 01, 2017, 09:44:13 EST Admin found out about it when Currie sent it to legal for review
|