VinnieVOL
|
|
« on: January 31, 2014, 03:32:29 EST » |
|
per Doug Matthews
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Clockwork Orange
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2014, 03:45:18 EST » |
|
Mixed feelings.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Stay patient and be strong, 'cause it's gonna hit. And when it hits, it's gonna hit hard."
|
|
|
Black Diamond Vol
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2014, 03:51:04 EST » |
|
No mixed feelings here. It sucks. I will never buy Nike shizzle. Ever.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Clockwork Orange
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2014, 03:51:58 EST » |
|
No mixed feelings here. It sucks. I will never buy Nike shizzle. Ever. It helps with recruiting. That's the positive.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Stay patient and be strong, 'cause it's gonna hit. And when it hits, it's gonna hit hard."
|
|
|
VinnieVOL
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2014, 03:56:11 EST » |
|
It helps with recruiting. That's the positive.
Yep, I don't care either way so if recruits like it let's go. BLACK CLEATS, please?!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Creek Walker
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2014, 04:10:52 EST » |
|
Kinda like running a red light on Kingston Pike. You KNOW what's coming. You KNOW you're gonna get that citation in the mail. But when it comes you still shout obscenities and kick the dog.
Not gonna lie...I hate it. I know a majority of UT fans are giddy about it. But I hate it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
VinnieVOL
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2014, 04:23:33 EST » |
|
What difference does it make, really? I don't understand why people hate it, and I don't know why others love it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Creek Walker
Guest
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2014, 04:39:46 EST » |
|
I don't understand why others love it, I'm with you there. I'm just not a Nike fan. Never have been. If pressed, I probably couldn't give many good reasons (though I do dislike the perception -- and maybe that's all it is -- that Nike influences college athletics by funneling money into the game). But I've passed over Nike gear in the stores since I was a kid. I'll even by Rawlings before Nike. I'm not loyal to Adidas; I would've been fine with Under Armour. But I have to admit that I don't like just going along with whatever's popular...which may be a big reason why I've always passed on Nike gear.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Volznut
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2014, 04:54:36 EST » |
|
It helps recruiting a lot, believe it or not - so it's a good move if you're a Vol fan.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
VinnieVOL
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 31, 2014, 05:23:55 EST » |
|
It helps recruiting a lot, believe it or not - so it's a good move if you're a Vol fan.
A week before NSD.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Black Diamond Vol
|
|
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2014, 01:48:08 EST » |
|
Why do I hate it? Let me count the reasons: 1. If someone stole your wife or girlfriend, would you want to go to work for them? Because it's well documented that Nike has meddled in our recruiting, and even swayed a few of our commits elsewhere (Remember Josh Selby?). Their camps routinely blackball recruits who are committed to Adidas or Under Armor schools. World Wide Wes is a noted Nike shill. And now we actually want to wear their logo? Yes, they'll probably help our recruiting. Just don't ask why or how. You probably don't want to know how that sausage is made. 2. I don't really have to detail their shameful history of overseas labor practices, do I? 3. They're responsible for this And this And this And this Yes, that uni is made of denim. fizzleing denim. 4. Before Earl Woods' body was even cold, they exploited his death to sell shoes. http://www.youtube.com/v/mUq-ttAcQxgAnd a couple years later, when Tiger was dealing with his scandal, they did it again. http://www.youtube.com/v/5NTRvlrP2NUSeriously- what kind of evil, soulless corporation does that? 5. Tennessee, Nebraska, and Notre Dame were the original three Adidas schools. We remain one of their marquee accounts to this day. If the rumors are true, they offered much more money than Nike even in this bidding cycle. Do you really think that Nike is going to give us the same perks and attention they give Oregon, OSU, USC, Bammer, UF, or UK? Or that Adidas is giving us right now? 6. When amateurism in sports is dead (assuming it's not already) and its epitaph is written, it will be noted that Nike played a big role in its demise. I'd much rather that UT have not been a part of that. Dave Hart has lost big points with me today.
|
|
« Last Edit: February 01, 2014, 02:19:06 EST by Black Diamond Vol »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
HerbTarlekVol
|
|
« Reply #11 on: February 01, 2014, 04:17:29 EST » |
|
My biggest issue with Nike is what they have done with AAU basketball that has made college basketball recruiting such a cesspool of corruption. I don't really have any issues with the products the produce, other than that their shoes don't fit me very well. adidas and Asics are pretty much what I have to stay with since I can't find Pro Keds like I used to wear when I was young.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Go Army - Beat Navy!
|
|
|
midtnvol
|
|
« Reply #12 on: February 01, 2014, 03:58:41 EST » |
|
My biggest issue with Nike is what they have done with AAU basketball that has made college basketball recruiting such a cesspool of corruption. I don't really have any issues with the products the produce, other than that their shoes don't fit me very well. adidas and Asics are pretty much what I have to stay with since I can't find Pro Keds like I used to wear when I was young.
My personal favorite,
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Volznut
|
|
« Reply #13 on: February 01, 2014, 04:19:08 EST » |
|
Here's the thing BDV. All of your points are relevant in terms of personal reasons to not like the deal. But we're not recruits. If you or any Vol fan want to see Vol athletics back to relevancy, we have to have whatever we need to get the edge in recruiting. This is just one of those things that some recruits love, and no matter how stupid that may sound, it's a reality. I like the move for that reason only. It will help recruiting, both in football and basketball. That's a fact.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Black Diamond Vol
|
|
« Reply #14 on: February 01, 2014, 05:27:05 EST » |
|
Here's the thing BDV. All of your points are relevant in terms of personal reasons to not like the deal. But we're not recruits. If you or any Vol fan want to see Vol athletics back to relevancy, we have to have whatever we need to get the edge in recruiting. This is just one of those things that some recruits love, and no matter how stupid that may sound, it's a reality. I like the move for that reason only. It will help recruiting, both in football and basketball. That's a fact.
And yet here we sit, with the #2 class in America. So adding the swoosh to that equation means we should be guaranteed #1 next year, right? Notre Dame and A&M, both Adidas schools, are also recruiting very well. The best athletic department in the country last year was Louisville, and that's not even up for debate. They won the NC in mens' hoops, reached the title game in womens' hoops, their baseball team reached the CWS, and their football team smacked UF around in the Sugar Bowl and finished in the top ten. Somehow, despite their Adidas handicap, they managed to recruit enough athletes in all those sports to contend nationally. Sorry, I don't buy it. This whole deal has a "we just sold our souls" feel to it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
VinnieVOL
|
|
« Reply #15 on: February 01, 2014, 06:18:45 EST » |
|
Well, the more I think about it the more I like it.
Ainge said Nike footballs are better and the cleats are more comfy, too. So there's that.
I have no personal beef with Nike, so I'm good.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Volznut
|
|
« Reply #16 on: February 01, 2014, 06:27:30 EST » |
|
And yet here we sit, with the #2 class in America. So adding the swoosh to that equation means we should be guaranteed #1 next year, right? Notre Dame and A&M, both Adidas schools, are also recruiting very well. The best athletic department in the country last year was Louisville, and that's not even up for debate. They won the NC in mens' hoops, reached the title game in womens' hoops, their baseball team reached the CWS, and their football team smacked UF around in the Sugar Bowl and finished in the top ten. Somehow, despite their Adidas handicap, they managed to recruit enough athletes in all those sports to contend nationally. Sorry, I don't buy it. This whole deal has a "we just sold our souls" feel to it. we'll finish about #6, which is great. Nike/Adidas isn't the main factor to recruiting, but it does help our image with kids. Check out the schools above us, most are Nike. It's well documented that Nike has the "cool" factor with kids...it's not even debatable. Hell, many of our recruits tweeted immediately how they love the switch.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Creek Walker
Guest
|
|
« Reply #17 on: February 01, 2014, 09:20:29 EST » |
|
And yet here we sit, with the #2 class in America. So adding the swoosh to that equation means we should be guaranteed #1 next year, right? Notre Dame and A&M, both Adidas schools, are also recruiting very well. The best athletic department in the country last year was Louisville, and that's not even up for debate. They won the NC in mens' hoops, reached the title game in womens' hoops, their baseball team reached the CWS, and their football team smacked UF around in the Sugar Bowl and finished in the top ten. Somehow, despite their Adidas handicap, they managed to recruit enough athletes in all those sports to contend nationally. Sorry, I don't buy it. This whole deal has a "we just sold our souls" feel to it. This. The "it helps recruiting" line as an umbrella excuse loses its luster after a while. I mean, are there some recruits who would rather play at a Nike school than at an Adidas school? Sure. We're all loyal to our brands, especially those we deem cool. (If I were being recruited by a total outdoorsman team, I'd sign with the one that wore Columbia gear as opposed to North Face. ) But can we recruit just fine without it? Uh, yeah. I just hate seeing the "it helps recruiting" line for everything...there are probably lots of things we could do under the guise of helping recruit. Treating college girls like professional escorts was a good idea for "helping recruiting" until it wasn't.
|
|
« Last Edit: February 01, 2014, 09:25:26 EST by Creek Walker »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BanditVol
|
|
« Reply #18 on: February 01, 2014, 09:57:43 EST » |
|
I don't really care one way or the other. I don't like Nike, but my dislike does not extend to not wanting UT to avoid them.
I am kind of pissed about how they screwed us out of some basketball commits, but at least that won't happen any more.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The speed of our movements is amazing, even to me, and must be a constant source of surprise to the Germans.” G. Patton
|
|
|
|
Tnphil
|
|
« Reply #20 on: February 02, 2014, 11:13:47 EST » |
|
Still got a pair of 1952 Chuck Taylor Converse All-Stars. Still in good shape with about half the tread still on them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Screaming Eagle Dad
|
|
« Reply #21 on: February 03, 2014, 03:09:26 EST » |
|
I like the way Addidas did the football uniforms, espectially the Smokey Gray ones, they looked real real sharp to me. I'm wondering how Tennessee Orange will look when made by Nike and wondering if Nike will be able to come up with a Smokey Gray uniform that looks as good as the one by Addidas?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jethro
|
|
« Reply #22 on: February 03, 2014, 06:57:55 EST » |
|
I don't really care one way or the other. I don't like Nike, but my dislike does not extend to not wanting UT to avoid them.
I am kind of pissed about how they screwed us out of some basketball commits, but at least that won't happen any more.
Why? Do you think Worldwide Wes will start funneling basketball recruits to Tennessee instead of Kentucky? I don't see that happening. UNC has been a Nike school for years and I hate it but the bottom line and the only thing that really bothers me is that ugly swoosh on every one of my UNC t-shirts, jackets, hoodies, whatever.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Black Diamond Vol
|
|
« Reply #23 on: February 03, 2014, 09:17:50 EST » |
|
This. The "it helps recruiting" line as an umbrella excuse loses its luster after a while. I mean, are there some recruits who would rather play at a Nike school than at an Adidas school? Sure. We're all loyal to our brands, especially those we deem cool. (If I were being recruited by a total outdoorsman team, I'd sign with the one that wore Columbia gear as opposed to North Face. ) But can we recruit just fine without it? Uh, yeah. I just hate seeing the "it helps recruiting" line for everything...there are probably lots of things we could do under the guise of helping recruit. Treating college girls like professional escorts was a good idea for "helping recruiting" until it wasn't. In this case, "Nike will help our recruiting" means "Nike will stop trying to steal our recruits". It's kind of like paying "protection" money to your local organized crime syndicate. Just think of nike as this guy...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BanditVol
|
|
« Reply #24 on: February 04, 2014, 03:12:05 EST » |
|
Why? Do you think Worldwide Wes will start funneling basketball recruits to Tennessee instead of Kentucky? I don't see that happening. UNC has been a Nike school for years and I hate it but the bottom line and the only thing that really bothers me is that ugly swoosh on every one of my UNC t-shirts, jackets, hoodies, whatever.
I am referring back to some links posted a few years ago that suggested Nike didn't want a certain recruit (whose name I never quite registered) attending an Adidas school. So I am guessing they will not do that in the future, but to be honest it was never a story I followed closely. Just saying that's about the only positive I see...but you CBR, it might not even be a positive. Now if I have to have the swoosh on all my UT gear I might get upset, but I don't think that will be the case. Surely some gear will not have the Nike swoosh. And besides, my relatives loaded me up with so much UT gear at Christmas I had to ask them to stop. I am stocked for years to come.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The speed of our movements is amazing, even to me, and must be a constant source of surprise to the Germans.” G. Patton
|
|
|
|