NIL Math

[murfvol]

I have an NIL math question. Conjecture is welcome.

If we spent $15 million on NIL, what cumulative percentage went to the following groups?

Poor Players
Heard
Campbell

Iffy or Developing Players
Nico
Brazell
Mike Matthews
Braylon Staley

I'm trying to figure out how much goes to productive guys as opposed to guys who could be productive in the future, or old guys who aren't producing.

[BanditVol]

Pretty much unknowable, NIL is not subject to public scrutiny

[murfvol]

Indeed, and numbers which are bandied about come from those with motives.

However, perhaps it's possible to get directionally correct figures.

If Nico is 2/15, Heard is 1/15, Campbell is .5/15, Brazell is .5/15, Matthews is .5/15, and Staley is .25/15, that's basically 1/3 of total outlay.

[BanditVol]

Indeed, and numbers which are bandied about come from those with motives.

However, perhaps it's possible to get directionally correct figures.

If Nico is 2/15, Heard is 1/15, Campbell is .5/15, Brazell is .5/15, Matthews is .5/15, and Staley is .25/15, that's basically 1/3 of total outlay.

Hm, I guess if numbers are being thrown about, you can do the math.  Wondering if there are any other numbers.